That thinking can spiral out of control.but then I see the 1640TL-V appears to have the same footprint. Yikes! so now I am thinking again.
For me after considering 16", then 17" and 18" I came back to 14" swing was the Goldilocks swing for lathes. Because are you really going to hoist an 800 lb length of bar stock and spin it in one of these Asian lathes, not happening imo. On paper it may have the capacity, it may fit dimensionally but can the machine actually handle stock of that weight class?
Increased swing over the cross could be critical. Maybe that 2 extra inches of swing gives you 1 extra inch of swing over the cross slide and maybe it doesn't, check the specs. Even then though we are back to dimensional capacity vs actual capacity and capability of the machine to spin larger diameter heavy stock and make use of that extra swing capacity.
Here are the steady rests for two 14" lathes. On the left a 1959 SAG 14 vs a 2 year old Grizzly G0709 14" on the right. Now which has more actual capacity.
Here are the follow rests, both 14" lathes on paper. This pattern just keeps repeating. Compound larger, wider, heavier duty. Tailstock larger, much larger diameter quill. Cross slide larger, wider. Carriage much larger, wider. Bed ways 10+ inches vs 7 inches and dimensionally much larger.
The SAG 14 has a 2" spindle bore which you can get on an Asian 14" lathe, but can you get it with 5+ inch diameter spindle bearings like the SAG 14 with a 27" long spindle?
I'm not saying don't buy a new Asian lathe, I own one and I'm reasonably happy with it. But go into this with your eyes wide open with a common sense view of actual machine capability vs what's printed in the specs.
The total lathe weight, 2,900 lbs vs 1,300 lbs, which really has more capacity and capability. Grizzly lathe 2hp, the SAG 14 5hp.
I'm not trying to pick on the Asian machines built today. This applies to pretty much everything for sale now, nuts, bolts, washers whatever it's all become smaller, lighter, thinner e.g. cheaper and less capable vs days of old.
Last edited:
