• We want to encourage those of you who ENJOY our site and find it USEFUL to DONATE and UPGRADE your membership from active member to donating or premium membership. If you want to know the differences in membership benefits, please visit THIS PAGE:

    https://www.hobby-machinist.com/premium/

    Donating memberships start at just $10 per year. These memberships are in fact donations that help pay our costs, and keep our site running!
    Thank you for your donation, God Bless You
  • June Project of the Month (Click "x" at right to dismiss)
[4]

10EE pulley sizes and RPM

[3]
[10] Like what you see?
Click here to donate to this forum and upgrade your account!

b335249

Swarf
Registered Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2018
Messages
23
Likes
6
#1
Hi all,
I have a round dial machine that is missing the motor and drive guts. What I do have is the spindle pulley and gearbox. The pulley uses a flat belt and measures approximately 5-1/2" in diameter. The inverter motor I have selected for the VFD conversion is 5 h.p. rated for 1750, however the data plate says MAX RPM 6000.
So, hear is my question...What diameter drive pulley came standard on these machines and should I use that size going forward? The machine has a RPM dial that reads 0-4000.
 

Cal Haines

Active Member
Staff member
Active Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Messages
419
Likes
52
#2
The original DC motor would have had a base speed of 690 RPM and a top speed (with field weakening) of 2400 RPM. Use the pulley that you have see how it works for you.
 

Karl_T

H-M Supporter - Sustaining Member
H-M Supporter - Sustaining Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2014
Messages
968
Likes
405
#3
My round dial 10EE was different than cal's. It had a 1:1 ratio between the motor and spindle in high gear. Back gear chops it to 6:1. This machine also uses a flat belt, with teeth.

I use the same 1:1 ratio with my 5hp standard 1750 3 phase motor and VFD. I spin it up to 4000 RPM max.
 

b335249

Swarf
Registered Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2018
Messages
23
Likes
6
#4
My round dial 10EE was different than cal's. It had a 1:1 ratio between the motor and spindle in high gear. Back gear chops it to 6:1. This machine also uses a flat belt, with teeth.

I use the same 1:1 ratio with my 5hp standard 1750 3 phase motor and VFD. I spin it up to 4000 RPM max.
So..is your pulley on the motor the same size as the spindle? (5-1/2)
 

Karl_T

H-M Supporter - Sustaining Member
H-M Supporter - Sustaining Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2014
Messages
968
Likes
405
#5
yep, that's what I mean by 1:1
 

Cal Haines

Active Member
Staff member
Active Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Messages
419
Likes
52
#6
You can trust me on this: all round-dial 10EE DC motors were 690 RPM base, 2400 RPM top speed. The machines could be ordered with either 2500, 3500 or 4000 RPM spindles, the only difference being the tachometer and the belt ratio. My machine is a flat-belt, 4000 RPM machine. The drive pulley is about 5-1/2 OD (just guessing, I don't time to measure it, but that's about right). The belt runs directly on the body of the collet closer and the OD there isn't much bigger than the OD of the spindle itself. I don't know if the gearbox is designed to handle 4000 RPM on the input.
 

b335249

Swarf
Registered Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2018
Messages
23
Likes
6
#7
yep, that's what I mean by 1:1
Thanks for your answer. I have looked at a few pictures on the internet
You can trust me on this: all round-dial 10EE DC motors were 690 RPM base, 2400 RPM top speed. The machines could be ordered with either 2500, 3500 or 4000 RPM spindles, the only difference being the tachometer and the belt ratio. My machine is a flat-belt, 4000 RPM machine. The drive pulley is about 5-1/2 OD (just guessing, I don't time to measure it, but that's about right). The belt runs directly on the body of the collet closer and the OD there isn't much bigger than the OD of the spindle itself. I don't know if the gearbox is designed to handle 4000 RPM on the input.
Well ok...I believe you however on my machine the driven pulley(on the main spindle shaft) measures 5-1/2" approx. then that would mean my driver pulley would have to be massively larger to obtain the 4000 RPM of a motor RPM of 2400. You are saying that your belt runs on the collet tube. Maybe mine has been modified before me???? Please look at the picture.....and yes, I know the belt for the gearbox is not routed correctly..lol
Thank you for your help.
Ben
 

Attachments

Cal Haines

Active Member
Staff member
Active Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Messages
419
Likes
52
#8
Thanks for your answer. I have looked at a few pictures on the internet

Well ok...I believe you however on my machine the driven pulley(on the main spindle shaft) measures 5-1/2" approx. then that would mean my driver pulley would have to be massively larger to obtain the 4000 RPM of a motor RPM of 2400. You are saying that your belt runs on the collet tube. Maybe mine has been modified before me???? Please look at the picture.....and yes, I know the belt for the gearbox is not routed correctly..lol
Thank you for your help.
Ben
I misspoke, sorry. It's my feed belt that runs directly on the collet-closer body. My driven pulley looks to be about the same size as yours. Here's a couple of photos:
IMG_0556.jpg
My original feed belt is gone. It came with a toothed belt, run inside out. I'll eventually change it to something else.

IMG14100.jpg
 
[6]
[5] [7]
Top