PM Research #7 It Begins

Huh... thats interesting! I'm surprised it held! Though, Clickspring has shown some pretty incredible projects with super glue holding stuff!

I just used a bolt through the casting in the area between the slides, then used a machinist-jack to hold it off the table/in place. You might be able to do 2 bolts to the angle-plate, since you have two sets of slides.
 
You might be able to do 2 bolts to the angle-plate, since you have two sets of slides.
Tom W, did a build thread on this model back in 2015. he hasn't posted since 2018. I sent him a PM.
He clamped his base to an angle plate and used a long center drill to cut the mains.
My concern is getting the base perfectly lined up using irregular surfaces.
Like you said, shims/jack where needed. It's a bit of a puzzle.
I have the angle plates and Kant-Twists. I'm going to work on the base this weekend.
Looking at the base and checking on the surface plate/surface gauge this morning, opposing corners are ground exposing less material that can be seen if looking.
I may try to set it up and mill the bottom of the base. That's the only way I can be certain of a parallel cut with the table (if that makes any sense)
My trick is to get the base equally jacked up and parallel.
Cheers
 
Tom W, did a build thread on this model back in 2015. he hasn't posted since 2018. I sent him a PM.
He clamped his base to an angle plate and used a long center drill to cut the mains.
My concern is getting the base perfectly lined up using irregular surfaces.
Like you said, shims/jack where needed. It's a bit of a puzzle.
I have the angle plates and Kant-Twists. I'm going to work on the base this weekend.
Looking at the base and checking on the surface plate/surface gauge this morning, opposing corners are ground exposing less material that can be seen if looking.
I may try to set it up and mill the bottom of the base. That's the only way I can be certain of a parallel cut with the table (if that makes any sense)
My trick is to get the base equally jacked up and parallel.
Cheers

You might consider your order-of-operations then, see if you can find a way to define your 'reference surfaces' for squareness FIRST, and setup based on that.

Blondihacks is working on a #1 I think, and she used her slide-rails as her reference surfaces. They end up getting 2 axes covered. Then, you can use the base/angle plate face for the 3rd.
 
Good point.
I like it.
The datum point of the crankshaft is the same as the slide rails. If I can square those......
 
Good point.
I like it.
The datum point of the crankshaft is the same as the slide rails. If I can square those......
That's handy! If it wasn't, you could always use a DRO or gauge blocks to offset too.

The silly part of these engines (or perhaps machining non rectangular things in general!) Is that 95% of the work is indicating in a setup. You spend 20 minutes getting it all lined up just to spend 30 seconds running the machine!
 
Jeff,

I'm looking forward to seeing your progress on this one. It looks like they used the same flywheel casting as their #5. They didn't provide any of the piping to connect the cylinders did they?

I've used super glue to hold a few parts for machining with no problems. It's a very common practice in clock making too. Remember this old commercial?

Eric
 
I'm struggling, the machining of the crank journal sets up the datum for the build. .094" below that is the crosshead sliding surface.
I was ready to mill the base before I had established a datum point.
The instructions/plans are designed for a more experienced model maker.
I'm going to go back through Erich's build and check out some other Youtube reference. Measure, measure , measure before cutting.
Here is a start this morning. I had to get the two high opposed corners flat to the base before I could go on.
Set ups and a bit of machining.
I'm comfortable with the base now.
I'll add some pics.
Fortunately I’ve broken cast iron castings in the past so I know to be extremely careful
 

Attachments

  • DC842FA3-F9C0-4A61-9ABE-F79BBA4C133B.jpeg
    DC842FA3-F9C0-4A61-9ABE-F79BBA4C133B.jpeg
    1.9 MB · Views: 42
  • E104AEA6-86E7-49E8-A72C-D90122D3AAEC.jpeg
    E104AEA6-86E7-49E8-A72C-D90122D3AAEC.jpeg
    2 MB · Views: 44
  • 1ED63034-0AA2-4723-8D48-2DEC79612673.jpeg
    1ED63034-0AA2-4723-8D48-2DEC79612673.jpeg
    2.3 MB · Views: 35
  • 6C7E14E1-C0B8-470D-910E-2A2B98793FBB.jpeg
    6C7E14E1-C0B8-470D-910E-2A2B98793FBB.jpeg
    2.1 MB · Views: 35
  • 467F95F7-E805-4043-888E-8391E4E98A5A.jpeg
    467F95F7-E805-4043-888E-8391E4E98A5A.jpeg
    2.5 MB · Views: 33
  • F29CF336-F65C-425E-987D-0E63588E1866.jpeg
    F29CF336-F65C-425E-987D-0E63588E1866.jpeg
    2 MB · Views: 32
  • 971E3437-8140-4FBE-87A6-117688D2C3B2.jpeg
    971E3437-8140-4FBE-87A6-117688D2C3B2.jpeg
    2.1 MB · Views: 36
You might consider your order-of-operations then, see if you can find a way to define your 'reference surfaces' for squareness FIRST, and setup based on that.
I hear you brother. I'll get it.
 
There is an Xlnt thread on building this engine.
On this forum, from Sep 14 2015.
PM Research Engine #7
By tomw
Forgive me if you already have seen it.
 
Back
Top