I contacted Boston gear a couple days ago with a gear part number I wanted a quote on. This is the answer I got from them after three days:Boston Gear or McMaster Carr is where I've had decent luck.
Motion Industries also has Gears, but I've never purchased from them. https://www.motionindustries.com/productDetail.jsp?sku=00367216
Is it for Lathe or something else? For Lathes, company's like Grizzly often carry them for the models they carry or sold in the past. I
All metric. I need an imperial gear to mate with the rest of the existing gear train... But thanks, Mike, I saved the link for later...
All was going well on this project until I looked up the dividing head setup needed for the 96T gear. Turns out it cannot be done with simple indexing with my dividing head which uses the standard B&S 40:1 ratio and dividing plates. 96 teeth requires differential indexing, which I do not have. None of the store bought gears available were really close to what I needed, and the ones that might be usable are stupidly expensive for this little project.No worries, Mike. I am going to try to fly cut the gear out of bronze to replace the stripped Micarta one. I have everything needed on hand. Tiny teeth, 48DP, 96 teeth, 2" pitch diameter...
That is why I went electronic. http://www.liming.org/millindex/All was going well on this project until I looked up the dividing head setup needed for the 96T gear. Turns out it cannot be done with simple indexing with my dividing head which uses the standard B&S 40:1 ratio and dividing plates. 96 teeth requires differential indexing, which I do not have. None of the store bought gears available were really close to what I needed, and the ones that might be usable are stupidly expensive for this little project.
You could make a simple dividing head using a 96T gear. Here is one on eBay fairly cheap. https://www.ebay.com/itm/RRP1896-Robinson-Racing-48P-Pro-Machined-Spur-Gear-96T/121957362063?epid=13012076097&hash=item1c6539a98f:g:K7oAAOSwLnBX7XxO
Great ideas, both, but this project is not even close to being worth the time, cost, and effort of building new tooling for it.That is why I went electronic. http://www.liming.org/millindex/
Pretty recently, there was a thread where a fellow was using a printed wheel with divisions as his indexing guide for making gears. It consisted of what looked like a piece of plywood, a shaft, a pointer, and a wheel that he'd printed off the computer with the number of lines he needed, equally spaced. There was another gentleman who was adamant that the work couldn't be done without differential indexing, but the fellow doing it seemed pretty satisfied with his results. So yeah that may be more time, or less accurate, than your project demands...I don't know. But it seemed a pretty simple set up, and it was endorsed wholeheartedly by the person who had done it. I know I could print off a wheel with 96 equally spaced divisions in about 5 minutes. So long as you have a way to tie the indexing portion to the work, and a way to lock rotation, it seems plausible to me.Is there a reasonable way to cut two 48 tooth patterns on the same blank, separated accurately from each other by half a division, without fancy pants measures?
Thanks, jmway for the kind offer. It could likely be done with far fewer than 96 divisions on a 40:1 dividing head, and the plastic would probably work OK for a one off project that is staying in the earth's atmosphere. However, I have dropped that approach to the project and am looking in different directions now. A stepper motor made into a universal dividing plate interface to fit the dividing head would probably also work, and would be really versatile, but is way ahead of my skills and again, not worth the effort for this one scrapped project...Pretty recently, there was a thread where a fellow was using a printed wheel with divisions as his indexing guide for making gears. It consisted of what looked like a piece of plywood, a shaft, a pointer, and a wheel that he'd printed off the computer with the number of lines he needed, equally spaced. There was another gentleman who was adamant that the work couldn't be done without differential indexing, but the fellow doing it seemed pretty satisfied with his results. So yeah that may be more time, or less accurate, than your project demands...I don't know. But it seemed a pretty simple set up, and it was endorsed wholeheartedly by the person who had done it. I know I could print off a wheel with 96 equally spaced divisions in about 5 minutes. So long as you have a way to tie the indexing portion to the work, and a way to lock rotation, it seems plausible to me.
I wonder if I was that gentleman?Pretty recently, there was a thread where a fellow was using a printed wheel with divisions as his indexing guide for making gears. It consisted of what looked like a piece of plywood, a shaft, a pointer, and a wheel that he'd printed off the computer with the number of lines he needed, equally spaced.