Turning hard-steel trolley rollers

jwmelvin

H-M Supporter - Gold Member
H-M Supporter Gold Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2018
Messages
1,511
At a swap meet, I bought a 2-ton beam trolley with a broken roller (you can see the flange broken off the top-right roller):
beamTrolleyBroken.JPEG

I TIG brazed some Al-Bronze to fill the missing section:
trolleyRollerBrazed.JPEG

Then I wanted to machine it to match the old roller. I turned down some pipe in the 3-jaw to serve as a mandrel with a shoulder and used a disc with a center hole in it to press with the roller onto the mandrel:
rollerMandrel.jpeg

Machining the bronze wasn't bad, but the roller body itself had about 1/8" runout! I was shocked it was that bad, but since I was holding it by the bearing surface, it seemed inescapable that the trolley would roll like crap. So I decided to true the roller as I machined the bronze:
trolleyRollerRepaired.JPEG
It's no beauty, but it was one of my first times TIG brazing, and seems reasonable. You can see there was some issue machining the roller itself, which seems to be very hard steel. Since all four rollers had the same concentricity problem, I ignored the issues with the first and pressed on.

I experimented with a variety of tools: HSS died very quickly, some inserted carbide chipped quickly, some did okay, and the brazed carbide seemed to wear and chip, but less than some of the inserts. I was enjoying sharpening carbide on my Rockwell grinder (23-501), so I stuck with the brazed carbide. Here's about what it looked like after sharpened:
carbideSharp.JPEG
You can see where I needed to make the tip angle a little more obtuse to remove the damaged material from prior passes; this is what it looked like after two passes:
carbideDamaged.JPEG

After repeating that cycle and seeing my lathe really show some unseemly deflection in the cut, I realized I should think about speed. Foolishly, I had turned my lathe down to its slowest speed without going to the back gears, so I was at about 350-400 rpm, which for the 4" diameter, was about 400 sfm. As I tried slower speeds, I realized I was just pushing too fast for the material, and saw major improvement when I got down to about 100 sfm. Here's a video showing the three speeds I tried:

So, I learned something, and think that the trolley should roll much better now than before:
beamTrolleyRepaired.JPEG
The top left roller is the last one, where I figured out that slowing down was a major improvement. In the lower left roller, you can see the ripples from pushing on with a damaged tool. I may go back and clean them all up now that I have the parameters figured out, but I think I'll probably leave it be.

Note on my carbide tool: I have a container of brazed carbide, and grabbed one that turns out to be an Iscar IC2 grade. I also seem to have Iscar IC70. This chart seems to correlate those with C2 and C7. This chart seems to show my IC2 as for cast iron but more general applicability, whereas the IC70 is less tough and more for finishing ferrous material. Neither seems all that appropriate for the job and that may explain some of my issues. The somewhat generic inserts I have may have done better once I turned the speed down.

I appreciate any further advice you may have.
 
Interrupted cut in hard material. That is a worst case scenario. The harder (more wear resistant) grade carbide is more brittle, so more prone to chipping in an interrupted cut.
 
The wheels may be cast iron, and the eccentricity may be by design so the trolley doesn't roll on its own. It's just a thought.
 
The wheels may be cast iron, and the eccentricity may be by design so the trolley doesn't roll on its own. It's just a thought.
Too late now. Now he needs to make a brake! Projects never end :)
 
Too late now. Now he needs to make a brake! Projects never end :)

Hehe too late indeed, unless I want to redo it with the 4-jaw. It does seem like a good theory as to why all four were nonconcentric so much and by a similar amount. I’d rather be able to easily roll though.

These are definitely not cast iron.
 
After watching the video, definitely not C.I.
 
It appeared the wheels were coned to permit use on a standard S beam (I beam). With the new cylindrical rolling surface they will best run on a W beam (wide flange).

Nice work.
 
The wheels may be cast iron, and the eccentricity may be by design so the trolley doesn't roll on its own. It's just a thought.
Were the wheels clocked to be consistent in the eccentricity? Really couldn’t be kept that way since they are all separate. Given random orientations, it would have rolled very poorly, which may explain the missing piece on the one wheel.
 
Back
Top