just looked at them, they are straight cylinders without the top flange I need.Saw some on the precision Matthew’s site earlier. Not sure if they would work or if they are total junk
just looked at them, they are straight cylinders without the top flange I need.Saw some on the precision Matthew’s site earlier. Not sure if they would work or if they are total junk
That’s unfortunate. Usually the precision Matthew’s stuff is pretty decent stuffjust looked at them, they are straight cylinders without the top flange I need.
That’s unfortunate. Usually the precision Matthew’s stuff is pretty decent stuff
I confused the conversation by not quoting each individual comment. I was generally responding to the conversation as a whole. Apologies!when you have a flange machined into your lathe around each oiler, not having a flange on the oiler just creates a moat of grunge around each oiler. not a style issue. yes, I could make little flanges to seat around them but why, when you can get them with flanges?
That's exactly what I encountered with the oilers I got through Amazon. The hole for oil is about 1mm. The Grizzly ones were what i would consider "standard" but still no flanges. They're still Chinese and $2.30 each. The Amazon oilers were $0.55 each in a pack of 10 and not a great deal at that price because of the undersized ball. I have not had success in finding "better" quality ball oilers in metric sizes. It's tempting to ream holes to Imperial sized as the oilers have to be replaced.my general criticism of chinese made ball oilers is from my personal experience and reading other users' comments. many have thin, weak springs and under sized balls (no joke intended). not a fan of chinese quality control, or lack of it I should say. some importers have success in getting better results from them than others.