- Joined
- Nov 18, 2012
- Messages
- 1,352
This is a very interesting observation.
First lets remember that there are many energy sources in our houses including but not limited to high power electrical devices, natural gas / propane gas appliances, fuel oil, etc.
There are regulatory standards that are available to try and ensure that these devices meet safety standards.
Sometimes these are not sufficient when first "regulatory approved". Good example is drip coffee makers of a couple of decades ago when it was found that the secondary one shot thermal cut off could fail in about 1 or 50,000 cases. This seemed acceptable until there were millions of coffee makers being produced. So the UL and other regulatory standards were changed to include two series and different over temperature fuses. This was successful.
So called Lithium batteries that Tesla is proposing are actually Lithium Ion batteries. These do not contain any metallic lithium.
Metallic lithium is very reactive and indeed is in lithium primary cells. They do however have a flammable electrolyte.
Having said this when something goes wrong with either over discharge or over charge of Lithium Ion cells, then things can go wrong. Metallic lithium can be plated out. Also if over charged, these cells can go into thermal runaway. Under this condition we have sort of the perfect storm. The cell has a flammable electrolyte and the thermal runaway condition produces oxygen. So we have a source of ignition, fuel and lots of oxygen. This is a very difficult situation to extinguish, and some strategies are to just let it burn out.
In order to be safe the battery management systems for Lithium batteries have two separate and independent monitors to ensure that bad things don't happen.
A number of years ago we would see videos of laptops and and cell phone infernos. Haven't seen those lately.
I can only assume that Tesla is aware of this and will provide appropriate battery management, and also meet appropriate regulatory approvals.
David
First lets remember that there are many energy sources in our houses including but not limited to high power electrical devices, natural gas / propane gas appliances, fuel oil, etc.
There are regulatory standards that are available to try and ensure that these devices meet safety standards.
Sometimes these are not sufficient when first "regulatory approved". Good example is drip coffee makers of a couple of decades ago when it was found that the secondary one shot thermal cut off could fail in about 1 or 50,000 cases. This seemed acceptable until there were millions of coffee makers being produced. So the UL and other regulatory standards were changed to include two series and different over temperature fuses. This was successful.
So called Lithium batteries that Tesla is proposing are actually Lithium Ion batteries. These do not contain any metallic lithium.
Metallic lithium is very reactive and indeed is in lithium primary cells. They do however have a flammable electrolyte.
Having said this when something goes wrong with either over discharge or over charge of Lithium Ion cells, then things can go wrong. Metallic lithium can be plated out. Also if over charged, these cells can go into thermal runaway. Under this condition we have sort of the perfect storm. The cell has a flammable electrolyte and the thermal runaway condition produces oxygen. So we have a source of ignition, fuel and lots of oxygen. This is a very difficult situation to extinguish, and some strategies are to just let it burn out.
In order to be safe the battery management systems for Lithium batteries have two separate and independent monitors to ensure that bad things don't happen.
A number of years ago we would see videos of laptops and and cell phone infernos. Haven't seen those lately.
I can only assume that Tesla is aware of this and will provide appropriate battery management, and also meet appropriate regulatory approvals.
David