Jim, my riser/stand is the same size as the base of the milling machine. As I was constructing it, I thought about going wider like you for stability but in my head I thought it may end up being a trip hazard so opted to stay as close as possible to the size of the mill base. However, now after having it setup, I don't think it would matter as the table size limits your movement around the mill anyways so it more than likely won't interfere or be any hazard at all.
These machines do appear narrow but most of the weight definitely is concentrated at the bottom thus making them look more unstable than they actually are. Mine doesn't move at all and I can't even shake it on my 8.5" tall base and is more narrow than yours. I'll bet yours is rock solid.
Mike -- Yes, I believe the machine is perfectly stable given its design and weight but I was overly concerned about stability. My previous mill is a Grizzly G0704 whose stand is narrow in relation to the mill. It was stable for the most part but I could not run a boring head extended, even at a modest speed without the entire mill/stand oscillating. I had to run it very slowly. I didn't anticipate this would be the situation for the 935 but I decided to go with the extra width. Anyway, I also thought about the tripping hazard but I came to same conclusion as you --- the table length would force me outside the trip area. I plan on getting some yellow "caution" tape to apply to the floor and to mask around the stand as an extra precaution.
John -- what is a MachTach? -- I'm working on building a tachometer using a photo reflective sensor for a pickup driving a simple panel digital counter available for $10.00 on ebay. If there's something out there already built maybe I wouldn't have to re-invent it.