- Joined
- Mar 30, 2014
- Messages
- 115
So I am wanting to buy a new chuck for my lathe. It has a D1-4 spindle. I currently have a direct mount 6 inch that came with the machine. Jaws are a little bell mouthed, but otherwise works fine. It does not have reverseable jaws (but has the 2nd set of jaws for gripping external stuff) its just a pain swapping jaws. Also the size has been a limiting factor on several things I have wanted or was trying to machine. I am wanting to upgrade to a 8 inch 3 jaw chuck. I am still keeping what I machine well within the limatations of my machine, I just would like a little more room to work with (chuck wise) and kinda like the reverseable jaws.
So shars chucks seem to be generally well spoken of here and seem like a reasonable "bang for the buck" since my budget is limited. I was wondering is there are any advantages or disadvantages to buying a plain back chuck and a seperate backplate, or buying the direct mount model? Pricewise, there is only a few dollars difference.
Specificly, buying these:
http://www.shars.com/products/view/962/8quot_3_jaw_Self_Centering_Scroll_Lathe_Chucks_2_Piece_Jaws
http://www.shars.com/products/view/20189/8quot_D14_Fully_Machined_Lathe_Chuck_Adapter_Plate
Or buying this:
http://www.shars.com/products/view/...entering_Scroll_Lathe_Chucks_D14_2_Piece_Jaws
If I have seen some threads on here correctly, is it my understanding you can, or have to, take a backplate, mount it to your spindle and "true" it up? If so, I suppose I can see a slight advantage to the seperate chuck and backplate. Being able to true it up before mounting the chuck I could see as being a potiential of more accuracy. So far that is the only advantage I see for seperate chuck/backplate Vs the direct mount.
I know on my current chuck, if I take it off (to run my 4 jaw) and then go to put it back on, I have to get it back in the exact same set of holes (I have chuck and spindle marked for this reason) otherwise it has more runout. I suppose thats one disadvantage to a direct mount. You have only 3 chances to get a good/acceptable ammount of runout. If none are good, could it even be adjusted?
Thanks for any input or advise you can give me.
So shars chucks seem to be generally well spoken of here and seem like a reasonable "bang for the buck" since my budget is limited. I was wondering is there are any advantages or disadvantages to buying a plain back chuck and a seperate backplate, or buying the direct mount model? Pricewise, there is only a few dollars difference.
Specificly, buying these:
http://www.shars.com/products/view/962/8quot_3_jaw_Self_Centering_Scroll_Lathe_Chucks_2_Piece_Jaws
http://www.shars.com/products/view/20189/8quot_D14_Fully_Machined_Lathe_Chuck_Adapter_Plate
Or buying this:
http://www.shars.com/products/view/...entering_Scroll_Lathe_Chucks_D14_2_Piece_Jaws
If I have seen some threads on here correctly, is it my understanding you can, or have to, take a backplate, mount it to your spindle and "true" it up? If so, I suppose I can see a slight advantage to the seperate chuck and backplate. Being able to true it up before mounting the chuck I could see as being a potiential of more accuracy. So far that is the only advantage I see for seperate chuck/backplate Vs the direct mount.
I know on my current chuck, if I take it off (to run my 4 jaw) and then go to put it back on, I have to get it back in the exact same set of holes (I have chuck and spindle marked for this reason) otherwise it has more runout. I suppose thats one disadvantage to a direct mount. You have only 3 chances to get a good/acceptable ammount of runout. If none are good, could it even be adjusted?
Thanks for any input or advise you can give me.