Box Gutters and Trim for My Steel Building

cwilliamrose

H-M Supporter - Gold Member
H-M Supporter Gold Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2021
Messages
142
Last year Hurricane Ian came to town and did a bit of damage to my hangar including destroying the 10' x 12' roll up door on the west end of the building. When that door failed, the wind entered the building and the latches on the large east-facing door failed. That big bi-fold door stayed attached to the building and really only received minor damage -- it could have been worse. One thing that was damaged and torn off was a piece of trim from the roof area. That cap piece was 20' long and it took a couple of hours to come completely off and land on the ramp in front of the hangar. The gutter was also damaged in one spot where a pine tree fell against the south wall. The cap and the gutter profiles share some features but the gutter is the more difficult to create because it's a three-sided box shape.

After the hurricane it was either difficult or impossible to get any help with repairing damage. Everyone with any skills was busy or they were unable to get materials. I finally got material to replace the screen structure that blew out but I had to do the installation myself. The new roll-up door is on order and I expect to get on their install schedule late this month or early next month. It will be almost a full year since Ian's visit and we're in hurricane season,,,, again. Fingers crossed this gets done soon.

There's a steel building supply company here that would normally be the perfect place to get the proprietary parts I need duplicated. Problem is they are busy making roof kits for buildings much more heavily damaged than mine. Their go-to guy for odd-ball sheet metal profiles is equally busy. But at least I could buy material from them. And I have an 8' brake so that 20' long cap piece could be made right here in my hangar in three sections. Of course I get to climb up on the roof and install them but first I need to make the cap and also figure out how to make the gutter profile on that same brake.

Below I describe how I made both profiles, concentrating on the gutter since it's the one that is the biggest challenge. This was lifted from a PM I have with Tony (C-Bag). At this point the cap sections are finished and installed. All those trim parts on the roof are now screwed down properly -- something you could not say before the storm. I need to take some of the damaged gutter parts down to confirm I have that profile correct and that will happen after rainy season is over. I did get the prototype gutter profile made so I know I can make the actual parts when the time comes.

Gutters;

1692299449806.png

The drawing above shows the box gutter and how it attaches to the building. That and the other trim on the hangar are proprietary to the USA steel buildings. That company went under about eight years ago so there are no replacement parts available. There is a local company where people go to get custom trim parts made. They took one look at what I needed and declined to quote the job. They are super busy anyway due to the number of steel buildings needing new roofs after Hurricane Ian. They did sell me the material to roll my own.... Finding a way to mark the bends took me a while to figure out.

I modeled the cap and gutter parts in Solidworks as sheet metal parts. That means you can apply bends to the sheet metal and change the order in which those bends happen. I quickly realized the gutter would need a special bend sequence. Here's what I came up with;


Capture501.JPG


The marking tool is just a piece of the galvalume that is used to mark a distance from one feature (edge, bend or bends) to another. I used a fine tip Sharpie to make the marks. In the case above the tool references from the edge of the blank to do the first 45° bend. And yes, and marking or bending errors are additive.

Capture502.JPG

This bend picks up the first bend as its reference.


Capture503.JPG


After the first two 45's are bent, this tool marks the next two 45° bends.


Capture504.JPG


This time I go back and bend the 90° angle at the starting edge. If I had done this bend first those 45's would have been a problem due to their proximity to that edge.


Capture505.JPG

Now I can do the second 90° bend.


Capture506.JPG


This is where I needed to skip a bend and do the three features on the other end of the blank. This is another 45° bend.


Capture507.JPG

This one is referenced off of the last one. You may have noticed the marking tools are color coded -- bronze side up tools mark the bronze side of the part, white side up marks the white side of the part. Helps keep the bends from being done backwards.


Capture508.JPG


This is the second edge bend. All three of these bends fit under the brake -- barely. There's a series of plates welded together to create the upper part of the brake and the edge of one of those plates is exactly 5" back from the bending edge of the brake. That 5" dimension matches the distance of the final bend (#10) from the edge bend I did as bend#9. So just as you get your mark lined up for bend#10 the 90° flange pops behind brake's structural feature and you can no longer get to your mark. What fun....


Capture509.JPG


Bend #10's tool references bend#6 to give me a 6" wide bottom and a 5" high back side.

I made some double-wall angles that slip over the edge where bend#9's edge is located that prevent that edge from slipping behind the brake's structural plate. These allow me to get the part into position for the last bend without conflicts. I made six of them and they will get spaced along that edge on the 8' long part when it's time for that last bend.

DSCN5343acs.jpg


This slips over the edge and stays put during the bending but it is easy to remove afterwards. I made these by loosely forming the hem slightly off center of the blank so the edges would have a little offset. Those edges have some lead-in angle applied to the blank's long edges. I slipped a piece of .025" aluminum between the the two legs before doing the 90° bend so the bending wouldn't close up the hem feature. I had to tap the aluminum out after each bend but it came out fairly easily. I flattened out the aluminum and used that same piece to form all six double-wall angles.


DSCN5344as.jpg


This sample part was just the last four bends. It led me to believe I didn't need to address the potential conflict with the brake's structure. When I did the prototype gutter I found out that last bend was going to be a problem.


DSCN5345as.jpg


I had thought to use a spacer board and confidently wrote on this test piece "NO SPACER NEEDED" WRONG! But I came up with a more practical solution...


DSCN5340as.JPG

This is PROTO#1 of the gutter. Note I started with a too narrow flange which made the flange on the other side too wide. Other than that the part was no problem to form. You can see the thin marks from the Sharpie in this photo.


DSCN5335as.JPG

These are the actual marking tools for the various bends. Some are shared with the cap profile, some are specific to the gutter. I labeled and indicated the edge to mark on the side that was to be 'up' during the marking. The color should match the color of the material to insure you weren't about to make scrap.


DSCN5337as.JPG

The prototype parts, so far. The cap is the simpler part to create.


DSCN5339as.jpg


Old and new. The old part fits very close to the new part when you push them together. The cap parts I made are now installed and all of the caps are screwed down much better than they were originally. I don't expect a repeat of this problem in the future but I'm also hoping they don't get another test like Hurricane Ian.....
 
Last edited:
Would this be easier with a press brake with a gooseneck die? As it is I can’t believe you did this with a regular brake.
 
I'm not sure as I'm not very experienced with press brakes. One thing I did learn is that if you mark the bend and lower the punch down close to the blank, you lose sight of the line. So you have to use different techniques. I'm more comfortable with a leaf brake, the one I have has been in my life for 40 years.

Any of this stuff help you with your gutter project?
 
Last edited:
I’m sure it will apply once I actually get to that project. What it really points out is understanding your machine, leaf or press brake and getting your sequence of bends down.

My present obsession is with the frog clamp. I’ve figured out a non CAD way to work it out and it turns out even with a complete dxf file it probably wouldn’t have worked because the whole design needs to be proportioned to the stroke of the pneumatic cylinder. I had two, one 30mm x 20mm and 25 x 30. Because of clearance the 30x20 wouldn’t work but the 25x30 I think will. As usual it’s not straight forward as I’ve had to go back and do some machine upgrades(new DRO) I’ve been putting off. Once committed it’s like driving off a cliff.
 
I had a quick look at the STEP files for the frog clamps. Looks complete except for not having the clamp 'foot' defined and no internal details of the cylinder. Using a different cylinder means you only would need the top end parts. Whether (or not) they accurately reflect the real parts is something that I could only determine by making the assembly operate in Solidworks. I didn't go down that path but I will if it would be helpful to you. Once that is done, the stroke of the cylinder could be determined. What size frog clamp are you looking to build?
 
Using a different cylinder means you only would need the top end parts.
Yup, that was the plan all along because I don’t need the proprietary clamp system built into the their version, I only need the upper end. So there is a point in the demo vid where there is a side view drawing that shows the locking mechanism in the base of their version in the up and down position. I took a screen shot and imported it into my drawing program and used its measuring feature and using the constrain feature blew it up and down until the cyl stroke was the same and printed it out. I could then use it to directly measure off of. Did it once for the 30x20 and then the 25x30. Both are square cyl’s with built in guides. I won’t be using the guides. It’s all very Luddite but I was able to work out directly how it will work.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0578.jpeg
    IMG_0578.jpeg
    103.5 KB · Views: 6
  • IMG_0583.jpeg
    IMG_0583.jpeg
    668.9 KB · Views: 5
  • IMG_0582.jpeg
    IMG_0582.jpeg
    301.2 KB · Views: 6
  • IMG_0581.jpeg
    IMG_0581.jpeg
    351.3 KB · Views: 6
That actually looks pretty good. If I can help using the 3D models, just let me know.
 
Double thanks. These kinds of projects, yours and mine, are all about being able to envision completely and then apply to what you have and know. For whatever reason doing things digitally defeats my ability to envision in my head. I don’t switch cerebral hemispheres easily and my envision lives in the right hemisphere and my digital manipulator lives in the left. So over a certain amount of complication my onboard processor runs out. Being able to turn the whole thing into a 1x1 representation is the only way I can grok the overall relationships.

I think I’ve got it now with the 25x30. It’s all about finding that crucial parameter starting point and that was length of stroke and diameter of the cyl. I learned from my FIL who was a genius of simplification if you are having to jump through too many hoops to make something work there’s something wrong. Img 0582 shows that first try with 30x20 and what was hard to show was it was too big around to mount and was going to end up fouling the clamp itself. Luckily I had the 25x30 and after resizing the pic it worked. I’ve got a whole drawer full of these little SMC guided cyls I got off eBay in lots of 4 or 8 for incredibly cheap. They were pulled off decommissioned machines and work perfect and have been instrumental in my jig press these frog clamps are going on. Never have too much stock to pull from.
 
My design process is in two parts as well, I clearly visualize a solution and then use CAD to make it real before building parts. And I continue to visualize as I model the solution -- both things are happening at the same time as the design is being developed. Prior to 3D CAD, I used to go from the vision to parts, making some scrap was part of that process. 3D CAD eliminates most of the scrap.
 
The major difference between you and I is you learned CAD years ago and applied it so its second nature to your process now. I’m just too busy with everyday production and ongoing projects to go through that steep learning curve. And if I don’t somehow make it into an obsession it will never get to second nature. I’m just insanely lucky to have you and another H-M local to lean on when I run into a brick wall I can’t weasel my way around. Luckily I think I’ve found a lo tech way around this time.
 
Back
Top