- Joined
- Sep 5, 2014
- Messages
- 428
I worked with one partner, the best millwright I've ever worked with, who was really into his work, he knew the bearing company histories and thread histories. He talked of John Deere threads on old tractors, but his take was that the standards just weren't there, they predated them. Each company then used their own. But I was never that dedicated. A Yammar might have the same couplings. Hydraulic fittings have a few standards, I wouldn't be surprised if the Japanese have a few as well.
When we come across a odd thread, we think it's proprietary, it might not always be the case. The Stanley plane is one I'm somewhat familiar with, as restoring old planes is an hobby. You don't dare lose screws. Another guy with the same disease , researched the thread use. Stanley planes were an 1860s invention and Stanley Works was notoriously cheap , so it made economic sense to use off the shelf. A 1860 British standard !
When we come across a odd thread, we think it's proprietary, it might not always be the case. The Stanley plane is one I'm somewhat familiar with, as restoring old planes is an hobby. You don't dare lose screws. Another guy with the same disease , researched the thread use. Stanley planes were an 1860s invention and Stanley Works was notoriously cheap , so it made economic sense to use off the shelf. A 1860 British standard !