Here in the "STATES" we have a variety of small hand held fire arms, in pistols .22 to .50 and in rifles..... well .17 to 20mm...
seriously 3000 yard range, 1600 grain bullet, 3300 ft per second.... 20mm
I have a fair to middling (but still sketchy) idea of your firearms laws due to watching Ian McCollum's videos.
To be fair, if a Brit can demonstrate a good reason for owning a bolt action 20mm rifle (well, non-semi-auto really, but I don't know of another action that's going to take the chamber pressures involved), that would be section 1 licence and perfectly fine to own.
.50 rifles, whilst not commonplace amongst firearms owners here, weren't unknown when I was shooting. However, the number of ranges big enough were few enough then and I daresay there are less now.
Getting a section 1 licence and adding firearms to that licence basically comes down to:
Do you appear to the firearms licensing officer to be of good character?
Have you avoided being convicted of any offence where the sentence is a custodial one (not sure about that, might be a custodial sentence of more than some short period)
Have you managed to avoid any consistent/long-lasting craziness?
Have you got access to the space to safely shoot the firearms you want?
Can you safely and securely store the firearms you want?
Are the firearms section 1 firearms?
Does the usage you've got in mind, fit into the 'good reason' principle (stuff like fox/deer/small game control, target shooting, work, historical collection; note self-defence
isn't one of these, although, if you do legally own a firearm for the other 'good reasons', a firearm could be legitimatlely used for self defence as long as you can demonstrate that, at the time you
reasonably believed the life of you or others was threatened).
I'm not a citizen of the US, I don't live in the US, and I know for sure that the cultural background of most UK citizens, me included, is markedly different to that of US citizens, so I've always refused to speculate on the rights and wrongs of US gun legislation; not my place to do so.
As to the situation in the UK, honestly, I'm happy with the
basic principles behind our firearms legislation.
What
I loathe is the knee-jerk, idiotic specific restrictions that come from politicians and civil servants, who know nothing about firearms, firearms safety, and, it would appear, how to write decent legislation. Stuff like the centrefire semi-auto ban and the wholesale ban on pistols is just illogical.
As many on here will be aware, a bolt action .223 rifle in the right (or more appropriately in this context, wrong) hands, could kill enough unprepared people to make the difference between it and a semi-auto .223 not markedly significant to public safety. The fact that our Olympic pistol shooters (if there are any left these days)
have to travel abroad to train, needs no commentary.
.
Anyway, I've rambled on for far too long. Sorry!