[How-To] How I made important improvements to boring heads.

tonyfoale

Registered
Registered
Joined
Apr 25, 2024
Messages
47
This post is about making some very rigid holders for indexable inserts for use with Criterion style boring heads.

Criterion.jpg
This is a Criterion boring head with a typical set of low cost sweated carbide boring bars.

A genuine Criterion like this comes in at around US $5/600 for a 2" version, but Indian made clones are about 10% of that. Whether clone or genuine article, often the main problem is flex in that style of boring bar due to their length and small diameter. As with any machining operation, rigidity is key to good results. For boring short holes or large holes we have the opportunity of doing better. In the bottom of the head there are two 1/2" tool mounting holes with grub screws, one hole is for boring small diameters and the other is used for larger holes. A more rigid way of holding the tool is to use both holes together to hold a rigid block with an indexable carbide insert.

Boring 01.JPG

Here we see the end of a boring head with the two tool holes and one of two insert holders fitted with two 1/2" bars.

Boring 02.JPG

This shows both of the two holders that I made.

Holders very much like this are available on the net at reasonable prices, so why make your own? Well I have two "identical" clone boring heads but careful measurement showed that the hole centre distance was a few thou different and both were a few thou different from the measurement that I saw quoted for a "for sale" item. Therefore, it was unlikely that a bought one would fit properly. So I made the holders to match one of my two heads, accepting that they would not fit the other head well enough. That was not a big deal, I would just use them with the head that I machined them to fit.

Boring 04.JPG

The above insert holder is for relatively shallow holes from 24 to 55mm diameter. A lot of my precision boring is for bearing fitment and this is perfect for that. I do not need a lot of overhang because the holes are not deep.

Boring 03.JPG

Above is the insert holder for larger holes, which can also be deeper because it will only be the mill quill which will limit depth. Because the centre between the two tool mounting holes is offset, it allows me to reverse the mounting of my insert holder, which gives two diameter ranges. On the left the holder is mounted to cover the diameter range 66 to 117mm, whereas the other mounting position can cover the range from 52 to 70mm. So between the two holders I can cover the range of holes from 24 to 117mm with a very rigid setup.

Boring 02.jpg

This is the insert holder that I used in a lathe for boring motorcycle cylinders. For that job the boring head was fitted to a very rigid bar instead of the R8 mandrel. The left hand side of the bar was machined to an MT5 taper to match that of the lathe spindle. I will make another post about its use for cylinder boring.

I made another relatively rigid insert tool for creating 45 deg. chamfers etc. by turning down a lathe tool. My requirement for this tool includes working in some recesses deeper than needed above, so it is longer but kept to the maximum diameter for rigidity. I made the tool by turning down a lathe tool holder. Shown next.

Boring 06.JPG

Boring 05.JPG

This shows the 45 deg. tool being used for a very difficult application. I was making an aluminium motorcycle petrol tank and I welded in the base of the filler instead of the usual method of bolting it on. It distorted into an oval shaped hole, which would not have sealed. So I mounted the top sheet on the mill as best as I could. The surface that needed truing up was at 45 deg. but the required width of cut was only a touch less than the side of the insert. So it was a full width cut on a 2mm thick piece held in place with 1mm sheet. Hardly surprising that there were some small chatter marks but minor. That was a severe test of the boring bar and I was happy with its performance.

Boring 07.JPG

Soon after doing the above modifications, I came across a Narex boring head which I just had to have. It cost me the price of two genuine Criterion heads but it is a beautiful thing.

s-l500.jpg
Almost complete in its original box, just two tools missing as can be seen by the empty compartments on the LHS. These heads were designed prior to CNC and can do amazing things. You can bore taper holes which otherwise would be next to impossible without CNC. It will cut internal grooves, which of course could be done with a Criterion style head and a rotary table, but the Narex does it without a rotary table. It also has a very sensitive adjustment, ideal for sizing accurate holes.
So now I need to make similar indexable tool holders for the Narex.
 
I have the same Narex boring head, was barely used and has the carbide insert boring holders. When I bought mine, I couldn't figure out why the feed was kind of wacky until I pulled it apart and found some of the drive pins where sheared. This was most likely because someone dialed up the feed release clutch too much. The feed clutch needs to be set very lightly so it feeds and then kicks out at the stops, it using a small ball that pops out to release the feed. There is an adjustment screw in the ring, be very light on the tension.

 
Mesa Tool made/makes a similar tool holder for boring bars. Though I believe the owner is in the process of retiring. Hopefully someone takes over, as they make very nice tooling.
 
Mesa Tool made/makes a similar tool holder for boring bars. Though I believe the owner is in the process of retiring. Hopefully someone takes over, as they make very nice tooling.

Yes, I mentioned that there were commercial versions. I see that Mesatool mentioned the hole spacing problem that I encountered.

"Even some of the new Criterion heads have odd hole offset.
Adjustable drive pin accommodates 1/2″ holes offset up to .75"


Their solution is to use the back pin to drive in a slot. Very simple to make solution but you lose some rigidity that way. If I had to make one that would allow for slightly different hole spacing I would make one of the pins with an eccentric section.
 
I have the same Narex boring head, was barely used and has the carbide insert boring holders. When I bought mine, I couldn't figure out why the feed was kind of wacky until I pulled it apart and found some of the drive pins where sheared. This was most likely because someone dialed up the feed release clutch too much. The feed clutch needs to be set very lightly so it feeds and then kicks out at the stops, it using a small ball that pops out to release the feed. There is an adjustment screw in the ring, be very light on the tension.

Mine looks like it had hardly any use. Some name markings indicate that it had been used in a college. I have used it quite a bit now and it has been trouble free. I am not heavy handed and I will take your warnings seriously.
 
Yes, I mentioned that there were commercial versions. I see that Mesatool mentioned the hole spacing problem that I encountered.

"Even some of the new Criterion heads have odd hole offset.
Adjustable drive pin accommodates 1/2″ holes offset up to .75"


Their solution is to use the back pin to drive in a slot. Very simple to make solution but you lose some rigidity that way. If I had to make one that would allow for slightly different hole spacing I would make one of the pins with an eccentric section.
Agree, you would definitely lose some rigidity. Custom fit fixed pins would be the first choice, so long as you're equipped to make one. Or for the ultimate, a one piece fitted dovetailed block to replace the factory slide, and eliminate another part altogether.
 
Agree, you would definitely lose some rigidity. Custom fit fixed pins would be the first choice, so long as you're equipped to make one. Or for the ultimate, a one piece fitted dovetailed block to replace the factory slide, and eliminate another part altogether.

No argument there, but we have to consider when enough is enough. Perfection is the enemy of good enough. I have made several QD lathe tools which fit the dovetails rather than bolt into generic tool holders. Quicker and more rigid.
 
@tonyfoale
I'm pleased to see you show up at Hobby-Machinist Tony. I've seen and appreciated your projects and skills for a considerable time.
Please keep the posts coming.
Be sensitive to the idea that your low post count on H-M may give some the impression that you are a novice and need help. :laughing:
 
I'm pleased to see you show up at Hobby-Machinist Tony. I've seen and appreciated your projects and skills for a considerable time.
Please keep the posts coming.
Be sensitive to the idea that your low post count on H-M may give some the impression that you are a novice and need help. :laughing:
He's no novice. I've been impressed as well.
 
@tonyfoale
I'm pleased to see you show up at Hobby-Machinist Tony. I've seen and appreciated your projects and skills for a considerable time.
Please keep the posts coming.
Be sensitive to the idea that your low post count on H-M may give some the impression that you are a novice and need help. :laughing:

My wife says that I need help.
 
Back
Top